zyk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
February 24, 2014, 07:45:57 PM

no they're building bitcoin infrastructure not googlecoin infrastructure..( some of this is proprietary). It has nothing do with being to big to fail.. its just we're strengthening it by making use of it in business.
It doesn't matter that they are building bitcoin infrastucture, because if "googlecoin" would be created, and it would be of better code quality, then they can easily just take in "googlecoin" aswell.
What I am telling you is that the support services are not dependent on bitcoin. So, it does not mean that the funds invested into the industry will guarantee the success of bitcoin.

Bitcoin is like the worlds first computer game. The entire industry won't concentrate in developing this single game. The industry will build many games with increasing levels of complexity and depth. The industry is not dependent of this one first game.

But Bitcoin is a protocol and therefore it is more sensible to compare it to the history of other protocols rather than computer games?

To an extent I agree I do not think this is a Higlander scenario

There can be more than one



There are more than one.....BTC and LTC....the first one 10 times more expensive and 4 times slowlier with a fucked up

reputation of plundering widows and orphans, vehicel of drug lords and moneylaundering...

and me is the public relations departement of LITCOIN Cheesy