All posts made by InternationalBankAlliance in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread
1.
Post 14998335 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):
^He just doesn't understand Australian economics of sound money. Probably didn't even read Kayak.
2.
Post 15238496 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):
I like BTC .
I buy for 1100 sell for 200 an now I buy back for 750.
Looks like the only winning move is not to play

3.
Post 15238660 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):
I like BTC .
I buy for 1100 sell for 200 an now I buy back for 750.
Looks like the only winning move is not to play

I hope they will now pump BTC to 1200.
Like they say, hope in one hand and spit in the other...
4.
Post 15332800 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
How could it be that the pump is already over?
People aren't satisfied with this. Miners shouldn't be satisfied with this. This way most people who invested in mining companies are gonna lose hard, they won't allow that, right? The profit ASIC manufactorers made could be invested into bitcoins, the profit mining companies made the last year, could be invested in Bitcoin below a certain price.
Exactly. Something is fishy here...
5.
Post 15334188 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
Just a pump and dump. World events are an illusion.
One thing TA kids got right - IRL events are as relevant to bitcoin as plotlines are to 80s pornos.
@DaRude, never let it be said that the True Believers don't double down.
6.
Post 15335259 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
Maybe all this dumpage was a sign from the robo whales to the rest of the world to stay away from their twisted little playground. there's no way they'd want REAL money to arrive. they'd get swallowed up and spat out by the genuine pros.
My impression is that this was sort of a Chinese exchange led rinse cycle. They pump it when they can and dump it when the real money shows up.
Sometimes I get frustrated arguing with people, let's say about something stupid, like "do cats always land feet first." I'll go through all sorts of nuanced dweebishness, start breaking down the cat's mass into subgroiups that rotate in different planes and waving my hands around like an idiot, trying to explain how it works.
And in the end it turns out that the guy doesn't know what a cat is.
I think many people here simply don't understand how your basic P&D works

7.
Post 15345548 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
brexit is related to bitcoin because the GBP is going down and the UK-guys want to save their money.. for example with gold or bitcoin.
Or the USD. There's always that.
8.
Post 15346030 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
brexit is related to bitcoin because the GBP is going down and the UK-guys want to save their money.. for example with gold or bitcoin.
Or the USD. There's always that.
Trump bucks

Yeah, I don't see the $ as a natural.
If my country's economy was uncertain, I'd head straight over to an anonymous Bulgarian exchange and buy something solid, guaranteed by maths and quality computer code, like BTC or DAO.
9.
Post 15346159 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
IMHO, people and investors are not simply sitting on uninvested money waiting for the next opoortunity.
To invest on Bitcoin, most of them need to divest something and wire it to exchanges. It takes time.
Remeber that stock exchanges and banks are not open 24/7. I think the main impact regarding new FIAT investments occurs more than 24 hours after the the event.
So because brexit, serious investors with no current bitcoin exposure are going to sell their Berkshire Hathaway & buy bitcoins?
10.
Post 15346226 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
Why not ? At least more investors are willing to follow this way, then before Brexit.
Why not? A better question is "why?" In uncertain times, why would you hedge with an asset that's, basically, the definition of volatility?
E.g. Yesterday CNBC:
m/2016/06/23/bitcoin-plunges-nearly-25-percent-in-6-days-heres-3-reasons-why-brexit-china-yuan-halving.html]Bitcoin plunges nearly 25% in 6 days: Here's 3 reasons why.
This look like safe-haven-class investment to you?
Thanks fro removing the suspicious link to CNBC, bitcointalk. Let's try this again:
http://www.c[Suspicious link removed]m/2016/06/23/bitcoin-plunges-nearly-25-percent-in-6-days-heres-3-reasons-why-brexit-china-yuan-halving.html
11.
Post 15346284 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
Why not ? At least more investors are willing to follow this way, then before Brexit.
Why not? A better question is "why?" In uncertain times, why would you hedge with an asset that's, basically, the definition of volatility?
Statistics
If the question "Why" is thought too many times, some of the answers & decisions will be YES, I take the risk for part of my capital.
"Statistics"? Show me the data, and your money. Until then, it's just hand-waving, not statistics.
12.
Post 15346443 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
Why not ? At least more investors are willing to follow this way, then before Brexit.
Why not? A better question is "why?" In uncertain times, why would you hedge with an asset that's, basically, the definition of volatility?
Statistics
If the question "Why" is thought too many times, some of the answers & decisions will be YES, I take the risk for part of my capital.
"Statistics"? Show me the data, and your money. Until then, it's just hand-waving, not statistics.
Let me gently remember you the fact that we are in a speculation thread.
Allow me to return the favor by humbly suggesting that "statistics" means hard data, not speculative musings.
Markets opening t - 60 seconds. Strap in.
Dow Jones Industrial Average 17,516.08 Price decrease 494.99 (
2.75%)

13.
Post 15346673 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
No. I can infere that, if a new event occurs, many different people will be asked to reevaluate their investment decisions. Independently of evidences, itīs legit to speculate that a percentage (can be indeed very small group) of those decisions will at the end be in favor of Bitcoin. Talking about several hundreds billions of EUR in the clasic markets (actually is more, much more), 1 or 2 billion EUR moving into the ecosystem is enough to put pressure on demand.
Itīs like use common sense to infere that if I roll the dice 20 times, itīs expected to have at least 1 match for a random number picked by you.
*infer. And no, you would not guess my number by rolling the dice twenty times, that's just nonsense.
Again: Speculation & "common sense" have nothing to do with "statistics." You may need common sense to interpret the data, but you got to get the data first. You don't derive statistics from a priori learningz & common snse, that's not statistics, that's a different thing,
If "common sense" was enough, there'd be no need for statistics. But there is, because common sense is very commonly nonsense.
...
Markets opening t - 60 seconds. Strap in.
Dow Jones Industrial Average 17,516.08 Price decrease 494.99 (
2.75%)

Face-ripping 0.00G acceleration. Bitcoin user not affected

14.
Post 15357495 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
Wonder it it's too much to hope for to breach 700 again this weekend......
Why? It's only $20 away. Was actually expecting 700s yesterday.
Staying up there is a different thing.
15.
Post 15358057 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
Right, so since we're on topic how many gun related deaths happen in US and how many in France?
Banning cars could markedly reduce the incidence of death by vehicle. But beware, someone might still be able to buy a multi-tonne missile (car) on the black market tho.
Personal liberty and responsibility has its blood price. Same for the lack thereof.
If cars were specifically designed to kill people, as guns are, how long do you think it would take for them to get banned?
That said, cars are one of the most highly regulated consumer goods in US. One needs a license to operate a car, the car itself must have a valid vin & be registered, inspected yearly, and, in most places, insured. The car must comply with all sorts of DOT regulations (safety equipment, emissions, etc.), and draconian traffic laws (speed limits, can't drive drugged/drunk, can't run stop signs, etc.).
I love both cars and guns to bits, and don't mind ridiculous analogies, but let's be real here.
*The volume is
rather disappointing. We have only so much time to capitalize on brexit, and that window is closing fast.
@yefi,
The UK may have committed 'an act of economic self-harm with global ramifications'No need to run away from home just to hurt your father

16.
Post 15358503 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
Right, so since we're on topic how many gun related deaths happen in US and how many in France?
Banning cars could markedly reduce the incidence of death by vehicle. But beware, someone might still be able to buy a multi-tonne missile (car) on the black market tho.
Personal liberty and responsibility has its blood price. Same for the lack thereof.
If cars were specifically designed to kill people, as guns are, how long do you think it would take for them to get banned?
That said, cars are one of the most highly regulated consumer goods in US. One needs a license to operate a car, the car itself must have a valid vin & be registered, inspected yearly, and, in most places, insured. The car must comply with all sorts of DOT regulations (safety equipment, emissions, etc.), and draconian traffic laws (speed limits, can't drive drugged/drunk, can't run stop signs, etc.).
I love both cars and guns to bits, and don't mind ridiculous analogies, but let's be real here.
*The volume is
rather disappointing. We have only so much time to capitalize on brexit, and that window is closing fast.
@yefi,
The UK may have committed 'an act of economic self-harm with global ramifications'No need to run away from home just to hurt your father

1. Guns are far more often used to kill food.
2. Non of those vehicle regulations apply to farm-use vehicles. They only come into play if you want to take you vehicle onto public roads.
1. What do you hunt with a handgun? Or an AR, which is what's being discussed here? No one is trying to regulate shotguns or hunting rifles.
2. Farm-use vehicles are used to make food. Think shotgun, which I could buy in many states by walking into a store and showing my ID.
I can also buy an AR by simply walking into a store and showing my ID.
@yefi, well yeah, self-harm is like that, you can't bring back suicides. I guess that's a win in your book?
17.
Post 15358865 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
Right, so since we're on topic how many gun related deaths happen in US and how many in France?
Banning cars could markedly reduce the incidence of death by vehicle. But beware, someone might still be able to buy a multi-tonne missile (car) on the black market tho.
Personal liberty and responsibility has its blood price. Same for the lack thereof.
If cars were specifically designed to kill people, as guns are, how long do you think it would take for them to get banned?
That said, cars are one of the most highly regulated consumer goods in US. One needs a license to operate a car, the car itself must have a valid vin & be registered, inspected yearly, and, in most places, insured. The car must comply with all sorts of DOT regulations (safety equipment, emissions, etc.), and draconian traffic laws (speed limits, can't drive drugged/drunk, can't run stop signs, etc.).
I love both cars and guns to bits, and don't mind ridiculous analogies, but let's be real here.
*The volume is
rather disappointing. We have only so much time to capitalize on brexit, and that window is closing fast.
@yefi,
The UK may have committed 'an act of economic self-harm with global ramifications'No need to run away from home just to hurt your father

1. Guns are far more often used to kill food.
2. Non of those vehicle regulations apply to farm-use vehicles. They only come into play if you want to take you vehicle onto public roads.
1. What do you hunt with a handgun? Or an AR, which is what's being discussed here? No one is trying to regulate shotguns or hunting rifles.
2. Farm-use vehicles are used to make food. Think shotgun, which I could buy in many states by walking into a store and showing my ID.
I can also buy an AR by simply walking into a store and showing my ID.
@yefi, well yeah, self-harm is like that, you can't bring back suicides. I guess that's a win in your book?
Well than talk about assault rifles, not guns. There was no mention of AR15s or assault rifles in to post I was replying to. You'll have much better luck if you don't lump all guns together.
Ah, sorry, this is the context:
Fortunately , some of my comrades are helping swing these number up by selling thousands of "gun factories"
which make it impossible to really know how many unserialized AR15s are in texas and worldwide.
Great company and people(and they sometimes depend upon bitcoin because constantly have merchant processing problems) -
https://ghostgunner.net/ https://defdist.org/TL;DR: Unregistered, untraceable, and grossly overpriced AR lowers for neckbeards who can't even walk out into the fresh air & hang out in a gun show parking lot for, like, an hour, to save themselves a grand.
18.
Post 15360043 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
19.
Post 15360349 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
20.
Post 15369055 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
21.
Post 15369355 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
[...]
Yeah, it was pretty dumb. How does anyone even think those things are connected?
A lot o' people don't realize what's really going on. They view life as a bunch o' unconnected incidents 'n things. They don't realize that there's this, like, lattice o' coincidence that lays on top o' everything. Give you an example; show you what I mean: suppose you're thinkin' about a plate o' shrimp. Suddenly someone'll say, like, plate, or shrimp, or plate o' shrimp out of the blue, no explanation. No point in lookin' for one, either.
It's all part of a cosmic unconsciousness.
*Bitcoin (BTC) $621.18 (
-8.69%)
22.
Post 15369710 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
wooooo please tell me again how great brexit is for bitcoin.
Although I don't believe politics like BREXIT will be left unmanaged by the Elite, let's see something here that most people overlook: Assume you are british.
What's best for your networth? Local fiat (GBPs) or BTCs?
https://s31.postimg.org/d36qs1vbv/gbpbtc.jpgWhat is "false dichotomy"? If your currency is failing, why would you pick the *second worst* currency?
Why not go with the USD, which is both simpler to obtain & hasn't dropped 8% today?
23.
Post 15381349 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
I corrected this user:
Bitcoin is the best performing currency this year. I think that's why people are choosing it.
My post got deleted.
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator.
Incorrect. The Coin Which Shall Not Be Named is the best preforming currency this year.
By far.
Doesn't even compare. Which, BTW, is an equally meaningless metric. Because Scratch tickets bought at Abdul's Bodega may be an even better currency this year, because he sold a million-dollar winner. Please don't think that buying scratch tickets from Abdul is a sound financial strategy -- it ain't.
If not obvious, this is what leads to trolling: Red team posts a whopper, gets soundly rebuffed by Blue, and, instead of accepting defeat gracefully, Red deletes the 100% factually accurate retort. Blue team feels slighted, and resorts to equally underhanded measures

"And so begins the twelfth year of my idiotic war. The pain of it! The stupidity!"--Grendel
24.
Post 15382961 (copy this link) (by InternationalBankAlliance) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):
As usual: panic? Gold up, bitcoin user unaffected

*actually BTC is down, but I won't rub it in, because that would be mean.